Aging And Marriage Essays - Human Sexuality, Gender, Personal Life

Aging And Marriage Reaction Paper: Marriage and Aging A big aspect in keeping a marriage successful is how much communication occurs between the two people involved. For a healthy relationship there is a need for quite a bit of communication. Communication, as stated in class, is one of the key elements to a successful marriage. There has to be some open discussions and trust in the relationship to make it anywhere. If you can not talk to your partner you will not be able to solve problems in a healthy manner. You have to be able to tell your partner things to help you learn and mature with them. You have to learn how to compromise and help each other out. Communication has to be part of your relationship in some way. You cannot go through your life not talking to your partner about important issues that you should be able to talk to them about. Another important issue discussed in class was homosexuals and marriage. Homosexual marriage is an important issue because it deals with a relatively large minority of the United States. This issue is important today with respect to many different ideas. There are so many ideas of morals, family values, and those of equality, constitutionality, and right to privacy. The aspect with the most relevance is constantly left up to debate. Homosexuals are 'gay' due to a combination of factors. These factors are environment and society-the outside influences- and genetics. Hence, homosexuals do not decide their own sexuality, nor do heterosexuals. Therefore, homosexuals should have the same rights as heterosexuals, one of these rights being marriage. This is why it is of great importance to public policy whether or not homosexuality is predetermined. I am not homosexual and I am not writing this to defend homosexuals. I just believe that the whole issue is unfair towards homosexuals. Marriage goes beyond the benefits, however. The institution of marriage is a very respected one, and holds much sentimental value for many people. In America, all men are to be created equally. Does this exclude homosexuals? Many think so simply because they believe that marriage is not a right, but a privilege. This argument means that because gays are not going to bring a child into the world naturally, they do not deserve the privilege of marriage. That doesn't seem fair. Different age groups hold their own opinions with marriage issues. Some young people, ages 18-25 are used to gays because gays have emerged in this generation. Middle aged people may feel fine with the issue or ticked off. People with families could feel that homosexual marriages around their community are different and unappealing. Older individuals have gone through the aging process and have not been familiar with gay issues until recently in the past twenty years. Since they are older, they are more old fashioned and are used to thinking the way they thought years and years ago. This is simply that a man and a woman fall in love, get married, have children and grow old together. But a homosexual marriage is an issue that these older citizens need to be faced with. Women make up majority of that older population and have a life expectancy that is longer than men's. As a result of longer lives, women are expected to experience chronic illnesses and disabilities. They are also more likely to live alone, be single and become poor in their old age. Visiting a cemetery, you can notice that the majority of the people deceased were elderly men. This concludes maybe that men were more of the hard workers before, who gave women the opportunity to take better care of themselves and in turn they lived longer lives. The elderly are treated differently all around the world. The percentage of elderly people in the United States has tripled since 1900, the population of elderly is expected to double between now and the year 2030. Not only is the number greater, but they are also living much longer. Even though there is a large population of elderly people in the United States, we as a society overlook them as if they aren't there. I think it is wonderful when I see

Free Essays on Explority Ethnicity As A Major Cause Of Violence In Latin America

Exploring Ethnicity as a Major Cause of Violence in Latin America – Primarily Guatemala & Columbia By: Derek Lowe Friday, April 25, 2003 This research paper is entitled exploring ethnicity because that is my endeavor. To support my thesis of ethnicity as the major factor of violence in today’s countries of Guatemala and Columbia. For clarification on the meaning of the word ethnicity – I will give the definition as the following: Ethnic Background, way of life, trait, etc.1 This definition will be key in understanding of ethnicity part in the violence portrayed in the countries of Guatemala and Columbia. My main focus will be however on the country of Guatemala. The dictionary defines the way of life as being part of ethnicity. Therefore that brings in several major factors of the Mayan indigenous people. One major factor was the fact that their lives were governed by their religion. Research shows that â€Å" Religion Permeated all phases of Mayan life. Law and taxation, for example, were interpreted as religious principles and religious offerings. Education was conducted mainly as training for priests, who made reading, writing, and learning caste specialties†¦. They conducted the numerous public rituals, including some human sacrifice by decapitation.†2 We can see now that religion was a major aspect of the indigenous Guatemalans. Therefore when this supreme way of life (ethnicity) was disrupted, the result was violence. Another major factor was brought to the indigenous group during the classic period (250 – 900). In Mayan teachings was now taught that land equaled life and to take away a Mayan’s land was to take away his/her life.3 What may now go through the readers head at this point is how do these factors, formerly stated support this thesis over the opposing thesis of outside intervention being the major cause of violence in Guatemala and Columbia today. What I want is the reader not ... Free Essays on Explority Ethnicity As A Major Cause Of Violence In Latin America Free Essays on Explority Ethnicity As A Major Cause Of Violence In Latin America Exploring Ethnicity as a Major Cause of Violence in Latin America – Primarily Guatemala & Columbia By: Derek Lowe Friday, April 25, 2003 This research paper is entitled exploring ethnicity because that is my endeavor. To support my thesis of ethnicity as the major factor of violence in today’s countries of Guatemala and Columbia. For clarification on the meaning of the word ethnicity – I will give the definition as the following: Ethnic Background, way of life, trait, etc.1 This definition will be key in understanding of ethnicity part in the violence portrayed in the countries of Guatemala and Columbia. My main focus will be however on the country of Guatemala. The dictionary defines the way of life as being part of ethnicity. Therefore that brings in several major factors of the Mayan indigenous people. One major factor was the fact that their lives were governed by their religion. Research shows that â€Å" Religion Permeated all phases of Mayan life. Law and taxation, for example, were interpreted as religious principles and religious offerings. Education was conducted mainly as training for priests, who made reading, writing, and learning caste specialties†¦. They conducted the numerous public rituals, including some human sacrifice by decapitation.†2 We can see now that religion was a major aspect of the indigenous Guatemalans. Therefore when this supreme way of life (ethnicity) was disrupted, the result was violence. Another major factor was brought to the indigenous group during the classic period (250 – 900). In Mayan teachings was now taught that land equaled life and to take away a Mayan’s land was to take away his/her life.3 What may now go through the readers head at this point is how do these factors, formerly stated support this thesis over the opposing thesis of outside intervention being the major cause of violence in Guatemala and Columbia today. What I want is the reader not ...

Medicare Budget Crisis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Medicare Budget Crisis - Essay Example Critics claim that America’s medical system is one of the failing ones mainly because of its expenditure and lack of autonomy on the responsible parties. As of today, about 44 million Americans (approximately 16 percent) lack any sort of medical insurance (Taylor, 2012). This is extremely absurd given that the government strives a lot to see its subordinates sustain their health. This paper will seek to discuss five Medicaid suggestions set forth by five different senators and provide one more suggestion, which appears more substantial when implemented. Senator 1 Senator 1 suggested to the Congress that the government should pass the cost of Medicaid to the states. A closer outlook into this suggestion shows that passing the cost of Medicaid to the states would have negative implications since studies show that most of these states might not be in a position to settle the expenses (Arnold, R2011). Even though this may seem hard and somewhat intolerable, the brighter part of th e suggestion posits that the government will be able to provide medical assistance to its citizens without many huddles. This is so because the states will be the ones responsible for their own medical expenses, which is more considerable when compared to the former (White, 2003). This is an indication that this suggestion is advantageous to the government and the citizens as well as the states since it is a way of distributing resources to the states. It facilitates easier access to medical aid to every state’s people making it reliable and affordable (Arnold, 2010). Nevertheless, noting that this suggestion is disadvantageous to agencies involved is crucial. If the government happens to resolve into passing on medical care cost to the states, many injustices will take place (Taylor, 2012). For one, the cost of settling any medical expenses incurred or getting medical insurance would be very high and therefore the states would not be able to cater for its citizens. Generally , the cost of Medicaid would only be worse due to its high cost when passed on to the state’s budget structure (Arnold, 2010). According to senator one, passing on the cost of Medicaid to the states would indicate that very many Americans would fail to cater for their medical care hence go for years without health care. This is very taunting to many citizens, as they would face difficulties when it comes to Medicaid (Arnold, R2011). Senator 2 With reference to the current system of medical care in the US, senator two’s suggestion is very relevant and advantageous to almost every American. Based on the idea that the government must alter the definition of some identification such as â€Å"poor† into those people who are virtually homeless, it is seeable that the government can save the presumed amount, which is $500 billion (Taylor, 2012). Altering the Medicaid qualifications is an advantage that the government may consider putting into place if it wishes to have its cost of health care decline and pave way for easier allocation of budget to other departments within the government (White, 2003). Additionally, lowering the threshold line, which is set by the Federal Poverty Line, can end up being a very essential tool towards realizing the predetermined savings amount in the Medicaid sector (Arnold, R2011). On the other end, understanding that the second suggestion can come along with several negative effects is of great essence to every party involved. In any case, if the government results into implementing